On Tue, Sep 16, 2008 at 2:24 AM, Luis R. Rodriguez <lrodriguez@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Mon, Sep 15, 2008 at 3:55 PM, Luis R. Rodriguez > <lrodriguez@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > With iwlagn (Intel 4965) on HT40 5GHz using iperf over TCP I get much > more convincing results (still noisy environment): > > mcgrof@pogo ~ $ iperf -s -i1 > ------------------------------------------------------------ > Server listening on TCP port 5001 > TCP window size: 85.3 KByte (default) > ------------------------------------------------------------ > [ 4] local 192.168.1.5 port 5001 connected with 192.168.1.3 port 41403 > [ 4] 0.0- 1.0 sec 3.61 MBytes 30.3 Mbits/sec > [ 4] 1.0- 2.0 sec 1.88 MBytes 15.8 Mbits/sec > [ 4] 2.0- 3.0 sec 7.56 MBytes 63.4 Mbits/sec > [ 4] 3.0- 4.0 sec 11.4 MBytes 96.0 Mbits/sec > [ 4] 4.0- 5.0 sec 10.2 MBytes 85.3 Mbits/sec > [ 4] 5.0- 6.0 sec 10.4 MBytes 87.0 Mbits/sec > [ 4] 6.0- 7.0 sec 10.3 MBytes 86.5 Mbits/sec > [ 4] 7.0- 8.0 sec 10.6 MBytes 88.9 Mbits/sec > [ 4] 8.0- 9.0 sec 10.3 MBytes 86.5 Mbits/sec > [ 4] 9.0-10.0 sec 10.6 MBytes 89.0 Mbits/sec > [ 4] 0.0-10.2 sec 88.6 MBytes 73.1 Mbits/sec > Are you sure there is aggregation on the air? In 40Mhz with aggregation we should be at least 110Mbit or better something around 150Mbits. This looks like HT rates but no aggregation. Tomas -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-wireless" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
