On Tue, 2008-09-09 at 12:41 +0300, Tomas Winkler wrote: > >> Meaning that other management frames are forward to user space while > >> BA action frames > >> are treated inside mac80211. > > > > Can you point out where? I don't see it. > It's should be visible in AP code Yi has posted, unfortunately don't > have it open right now. Anyhow since then the rx flow has changed a > lot as you know :) so it has to be reinvented. Ok, so it's not in the current code and I'm not entirely stupid for not finding it, heh :) I don't think I even still have the patches on this box so I won't look. > >> > Also, I'm not talking about the AP triggering the aggregation session, > >> > this is entirely done with the rate scaling right now, but about an > >> > associated STA wanting to start an aggregation session. Aren't > >> > aggregation sessions always triggered by whoever wants to send? So if a > >> > STA notices it has lots of upload going on it could want to trigger a BA > >> > session, which is something we don't currently support afaict. > >> > >> In iwl-agn-rs.c There is not difference if the peer is STA or AP. So > >> we support this already. > > > > Not sure what this has to do with the Intel RS algorithm? > > Just the trigger for aggregation is implemented there. Otherwise > nothing special. Well yes, but that just triggers when aggregation on our end, what I'd been thinking about was when the remote side wants to start aggregation. johannes
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
