On Tue, Sep 9, 2008 at 11:52 AM, Johannes Berg <johannes@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Tue, 2008-09-09 at 11:46 +0300, Tomas Winkler wrote: > >> Meaning that other management frames are forward to user space while >> BA action frames >> are treated inside mac80211. > > Can you point out where? I don't see it. It's should be visible in AP code Yi has posted, unfortunately don't have it open right now. Anyhow since then the rx flow has changed a lot as you know :) so it has to be reinvented. > > >> > Also, I'm not talking about the AP triggering the aggregation session, >> > this is entirely done with the rate scaling right now, but about an >> > associated STA wanting to start an aggregation session. Aren't >> > aggregation sessions always triggered by whoever wants to send? So if a >> > STA notices it has lots of upload going on it could want to trigger a BA >> > session, which is something we don't currently support afaict. >> >> In iwl-agn-rs.c There is not difference if the peer is STA or AP. So >> we support this already. > > Not sure what this has to do with the Intel RS algorithm? Just the trigger for aggregation is implemented there. Otherwise nothing special. Tomas -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-wireless" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
