Search Linux Wireless

Re: [RFC] 802.11d Country IE parsing/support

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Am Donnerstag, 4. September 2008 schrieb Luis R. Rodriguez:
> static int reg_rules_intersect(
> 	struct ieee80211_reg_rule *rule1,
> 	struct ieee80211_reg_rule *rule2,
> 	struct ieee80211_reg_rule **intersected_rule)
> {
> 	struct ieee80211_freq_range *freq_range1, *freq_range2, *freq_range;
> 	struct ieee80211_power_rule *power_rule1, *power_rule2, *power_rule;
> 	u32 freq_diff;
> 
> 	freq_range1 = &rule1->freq_range;
> 	freq_range2 = &rule2->freq_range;
> 	freq_range = &(*intersected_rule)->freq_range;
> 
> 	power_rule1 = &rule1->power_rule;
> 	power_rule2 = &rule2->power_rule;
> 	power_rule = &(*intersected_rule)->power_rule;
> 
> 	freq_range->start_freq = max(freq_range1->start_freq,
> 		freq_range2->start_freq);
> 	freq_range->end_freq = min(freq_range1->end_freq,
> 		freq_range2->end_freq);
> 	freq_range->max_bandwidth = min(freq_range1->max_bandwidth,
> 		freq_range2->max_bandwidth);
> 
> 	freq_diff = freq_range->end_freq - freq_range->start_freq;
> 	if (freq_range->max_bandwidth > freq_diff)
> 		freq_range->max_bandwidth = freq_diff;
> 
> 	power_rule->max_eirp = min(power_rule1->max_eirp,
> 		power_rule2->max_eirp);
> 	power_rule->max_eirp = min(power_rule1->max_eirp,
> 		power_rule2->max_eirp);

max_eirp should be max_antenna_gain in the second block, right?

> 	(*intersected_rule)->flags = (rule1->flags | rule2->flags);

Wouldn't (rule1->flags & rule2->flags) be more feasible?

> 	if (!reg_is_valid_rule(*intersected_rule))
> 		return -EINVAL;
> 
> 	return 0;
> }
> 
> static int regdom_intersect(
> 	struct ieee80211_regdomain *rd1,
> 	struct ieee80211_regdomain *rd2,
> 	struct ieee80211_regdomain **rd)
> {
> 	int r, size_of_regd;
> 	unsigned int x, y;
> 	unsigned int num_rules = 0, rule_idx = 0;
> 	struct ieee80211_reg_rule *rule1, *rule2, *intersected_rule;
> 
> 	*rd = NULL;
> 
> 	if (!rd1 || !rd2)
> 		return -EINVAL;
> 
> 	/* First we get a count of the rules we'll need, then we actually
> 	 * build them. This is to so we can kzalloc() and kfree() a
> 	 * regdomain once */
> 
> 	for (x = 0; x < rd1->n_reg_rules; x++) {
> 		rule1 = &rd1->reg_rules[x];
> 		for (y = 0; y < rd2->n_reg_rules; y++) {
> 			rule2 = &rd2->reg_rules[y];
> 			if (!reg_rules_intersect(rule1, rule2,
> 					&intersected_rule))

Hmm, &intersected_rule is uninitialized here and reg_rules_intersect does not
allocate anything.

> 				num_rules++;
> 		}
> 	}
> 
> 	if (!num_rules)
> 		return -ENODATA;
> 
> 	size_of_regd = sizeof(struct ieee80211_regdomain) +
> 		(num_rules * sizeof(struct ieee80211_reg_rule));
> 
> 	*rd = kzalloc(size_of_regd, GFP_KERNEL);
> 	if (!*rd)
> 		return -ENOMEM;
> 
> 	for (x = 0; x < rd1->n_reg_rules; x++) {
> 		rule1 = &rd1->reg_rules[x];
> 		for (y = 0; y < rd2->n_reg_rules; y++) {
> 			rule2 = &rd2->reg_rules[y];
> 			r = reg_rules_intersect(rule1, rule2,
> 				&intersected_rule);

Same here.

> 			if (r)
> 				continue;
> 			memcpy(&(*rd)->reg_rules[rule_idx],
> 				intersected_rule,
> 				sizeof(intersected_rule));

sizeof(*intersected_rule)?

Helmut
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-wireless" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Host AP]     [ATH6KL]     [Linux Bluetooth]     [Linux Netdev]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Linux Kernel]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]
  Powered by Linux