On Thursday, 4 of September 2008, David Miller wrote: > From: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > Date: Wed, 3 Sep 2008 16:24:16 -0700 (PDT) > > > On Wed, 3 Sep 2008, Linus Torvalds wrote: > > > > > > What's so hard to understand about this? > > > > Here's a simple rule of thumb: > > - if it's not on the regression list > > - if it's not a reported security hole > > - if it's not on the reported oopses list > > then why are people sending it to me? > > > > IOW, if it's just another random improvement, and you send it to me > > outside of the merge window, then what is the point of the merge window? > > This is exactly what I've been trying to tell the Intel wireless folks > but they refuse to listen. > > I just won't take their stuff until they get their act in gear. > > No problem. BTW, there are two regression fixes for forcedeth: http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=121894389018584&w=4 http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=121917167232014&w=4 that fix the regressions tracked as: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11358 http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11361 respectively and both are more than 2 weeks old now. Is there any chance to push them upstream or is there anything wrong with them? Thanks, Rafael -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-wireless" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
