Search Linux Wireless

Re: [PATCH] mt76: fix different licenses in same driver

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, 14 May 2020 07:03:45 +0300 Kalle Valo wrote:
> Jakub Kicinski <kubakici@xxxxx> writes:
> > On Thu, 7 May 2020 15:30:24 +0200 Felix Fietkau wrote:  
> >> Hi Ryder,
> >> 
> >> I think for this patch we need an explicit ACK from Stanislaw Gruszka
> >> and Jakub Kicinski (both Cc'd), because mt76x0 was licensed under GPL.  
> >
> > Thanks, yes, you definitely need an ack, especially from folks who have
> > their copyright on the files :/
> >
> > My personal preference for the license was expressed clearly when the
> > code was written and it is GPL-only. Felix, if you prefer the clean up
> > I'm happy to ack, but I see no reason to downgrade the license at
> > vendor's request.  
> 
> I think it would be unfortunate to have different licenses in the same
> driver. For example think of copying a function from one file to
> another, how would we handle that? So my strong recommendation is to use
> the same license throughout the driver. And in this case I consider mt76
> directory and it's subdirectories as being one driver, please correct me
> if that's not the case.

AFAIU some parts of the code were brought in from mt7601u which has 
a different license. As I said I'm happy with it if Felix feels like
it's needed. Just not a fan of vendors who barely contribute making
license changes.



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Host AP]     [ATH6KL]     [Linux Wireless Personal Area Network]     [Linux Bluetooth]     [Wireless Regulations]     [Linux Netdev]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Linux Kernel]     [IDE]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite Hiking]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux RAID]

  Powered by Linux