On Thu, 2008-08-28 at 14:56 +0200, Marcel Holtmann wrote: > > AFAIR people have been complaining about this behaviour _forever_, so > > it's hardly a regression. > > I think so too. However the question is still if 2.6.26 maybe did better > and we are now doing worse because of other patches. This needs to be in > the commit message. Otherwise this falls for me in the next merge window > category. Also, this is another victim of the "oh we post patches when we think it's convenient" rule, I took a minute to dig and the patch has been in the iwlwifi repository on kernel.org for six days already. johannes
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
