Kai-Heng Feng <kai.heng.feng@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes: >> On Apr 23, 2020, at 14:49, Kalle Valo <kvalo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> >> Kai-Heng Feng <kai.heng.feng@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes: >> >>> It's incorrect to use usleep in atomic context. >>> >>> Switch to a macro which uses udelay instead of usleep to prevent the issue. >>> >>> Signed-off-by: Kai-Heng Feng <kai.heng.feng@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> >> >> This fixes a regression, right? So there should be a Fixes line. > > Yes, but the regression commit isn't in Linus' tree, so the sha1 may change. No, the commit id won't change after I have commited the patch. I don't rebase my trees. -- https://wireless.wiki.kernel.org/en/developers/documentation/submittingpatches
