> On Apr 23, 2020, at 14:49, Kalle Valo <kvalo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > Kai-Heng Feng <kai.heng.feng@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes: > >> It's incorrect to use usleep in atomic context. >> >> Switch to a macro which uses udelay instead of usleep to prevent the issue. >> >> Signed-off-by: Kai-Heng Feng <kai.heng.feng@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > This fixes a regression, right? So there should be a Fixes line. Yes, but the regression commit isn't in Linus' tree, so the sha1 may change. Kai-Heng > > Also I can't take this until patch 1 is in my tree. And I don't know who > takes iopoll.h patches. > > -- > https://wireless.wiki.kernel.org/en/developers/documentation/submittingpatches
