I'm trying to get userspace client MLME working again and the next blocker seems to be in Probe Response frames being dropped during scanning (prepare_for_handlers() rejects frame due to BSSID mismatch when "not in scan" (which is currently defined as kernel MLME or hw scan). I can workaround this with the patch below, but I would assume there are some consequences in doing this (at least as far as CPU use is concerned). Would there be a better way of doing this? Should I add yet another parameter (like sdata->flags IEEE80211_SDATA_USERSPACE_MLME) for indicating another type of scan (userspace MLME scanning) and get wpa_supplicant setting that around scan operations? That would get rx->flags IEEE80211_RX_IN_SCAN set in __ieee80211_rx_handle_packet and consequently, would likely allow the ProbeResp frames to be received in this case. Any preferences or comments on this? Index: wireless-testing/net/mac80211/rx.c =================================================================== --- wireless-testing.orig/net/mac80211/rx.c +++ wireless-testing/net/mac80211/rx.c @@ -1828,7 +1828,8 @@ static int prepare_for_handlers(struct i if (!bssid) return 0; if (!ieee80211_bssid_match(bssid, sdata->u.sta.bssid)) { - if (!(rx->flags & IEEE80211_RX_IN_SCAN)) + if (!(rx->flags & IEEE80211_RX_IN_SCAN) && + !(sdata->flags & IEEE80211_SDATA_USERSPACE_MLME)) return 0; rx->flags &= ~IEEE80211_RX_RA_MATCH; } else if (!multicast && -- Jouni Malinen PGP id EFC895FA -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-wireless" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html