On Sun, Aug 17, 2008 at 8:07 PM, John W. Linville <linville@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Sun, Aug 17, 2008 at 07:20:54PM +0300, Tomas Winkler wrote: >> On Sun, Aug 17, 2008 at 6:02 PM, John W. Linville >> <linville@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> > On Sun, Aug 17, 2008 at 10:04:12AM +0300, Tomas Winkler wrote: >> > >> >> There is gap in current rfkill implementation that we didn't close >> >> yet. There were also few patches that were not signed by Intel and >> >> are apparently wrong. >> > >> > Can you be more specific? Do you know which patches are wrong (even >> > if you don't know how to fix them)? >> > >> >> 80fcc9e28cf3a209fbfb39a7bbddc313c59c7424 >> This one is wrong and there are more then are not acked even though >> they cause no problem. In general I would prefer that patches will be >> acked by Yi or me. > > And in general, they are. In general I would prefer if you would > work upstream instead of working in iwlwifi-2.6 and periodically > dumping a dozen or more patches on me all at once. C'est la vie... We cannot because no OSV or OEM ships latest kernel and mac80211 is periodically broken. There is a reason why compat-wireless was brought to life. The innovation to stabilization and testing ratio is not good. This is of course more complex than that and I didn't find the golden way yet. >> I will try to rebase our rfkill fixes ASAP from iwlwifi-2.6. iwl5000 branch. > > Thanks! > > John > -- > John W. Linville > linville@xxxxxxxxxxxxx > -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-wireless" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
