On Sun, Aug 17, 2008 at 07:20:54PM +0300, Tomas Winkler wrote: > On Sun, Aug 17, 2008 at 6:02 PM, John W. Linville > <linville@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Sun, Aug 17, 2008 at 10:04:12AM +0300, Tomas Winkler wrote: > > > >> There is gap in current rfkill implementation that we didn't close > >> yet. There were also few patches that were not signed by Intel and > >> are apparently wrong. > > > > Can you be more specific? Do you know which patches are wrong (even > > if you don't know how to fix them)? > > > > 80fcc9e28cf3a209fbfb39a7bbddc313c59c7424 > This one is wrong and there are more then are not acked even though > they cause no problem. In general I would prefer that patches will be > acked by Yi or me. And in general, they are. In general I would prefer if you would work upstream instead of working in iwlwifi-2.6 and periodically dumping a dozen or more patches on me all at once. C'est la vie... > I will try to rebase our rfkill fixes ASAP from iwlwifi-2.6. iwl5000 branch. Thanks! John -- John W. Linville linville@xxxxxxxxxxxxx -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-wireless" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
