On Tue, 05 Aug 2008, Johannes Berg wrote: > On Mon, 2008-08-04 at 20:35 -0300, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote: > > And it is already damn clear that what we currently have (rfkill always > > blocks on suspend) is not the correct way to go about it. WHAT I want to > > know now is whether there are any drivers out there which need the current > > behaviour. > > No. There are no drivers that rely on that. Seriously, all drivers Did you review them all? Including what is outside of drivers/net/wireless? > implement some form of suspend by simply turning off the hardware. Maybe on net/wireless, but I am really not going to trust that one for, e.g., serial and USB drivers (USB being a bus that is often not shut down during suspend because there are USB wake devices), unless you clearly state you DID review them all, and which ones. -- "One disk to rule them all, One disk to find them. One disk to bring them all and in the darkness grind them. In the Land of Redmond where the shadows lie." -- The Silicon Valley Tarot Henrique Holschuh -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-wireless" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
