On Sat, 2008-08-02 at 15:11 -0300, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote: > Currently, rfkill would stand in the way of properly supporting wireless > devices that are capable of waking the system up from sleep or hibernation > when they receive a special wireless message. > > Since rfkill attempts to soft-block any transmitters during class suspend, why does it interfere with suspend anyway? johannes
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
