On 9/25/19 3:58 PM, Denis Efremov wrote:
There is no need to check "rtlhal->interface == INTF_PCI" twice in
_rtl_ps_inactive_ps(). The nested check is always true. Thus, the
expression can be simplified.
Signed-off-by: Denis Efremov <efremov@xxxxxxxxx>
---
drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtlwifi/ps.c | 3 +--
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtlwifi/ps.c b/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtlwifi/ps.c
index 70f04c2f5b17..6a8127539ea7 100644
--- a/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtlwifi/ps.c
+++ b/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtlwifi/ps.c
@@ -161,8 +161,7 @@ static void _rtl_ps_inactive_ps(struct ieee80211_hw *hw)
if (ppsc->inactive_pwrstate == ERFON &&
rtlhal->interface == INTF_PCI) {
if ((ppsc->reg_rfps_level & RT_RF_OFF_LEVL_ASPM) &&
- RT_IN_PS_LEVEL(ppsc, RT_PS_LEVEL_ASPM) &&
- rtlhal->interface == INTF_PCI) {
+ RT_IN_PS_LEVEL(ppsc, RT_PS_LEVEL_ASPM)) {
rtlpriv->intf_ops->disable_aspm(hw);
RT_CLEAR_PS_LEVEL(ppsc, RT_PS_LEVEL_ASPM);
}
Acked-by: Larry Finger <Larry.Finger@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Thanks,
Larry
