Tony Chuang <yhchuang@xxxxxxxxxxx> writes: >> > I wonder if, given the problems I've seen (the driver can become >> > totally ineroperable), this patch and the previous patch (its only >> > real dependency) should be fast-tracked to the current release. >> >> I agree, this sounds like a serious problem. So I'm planning to queue >> patches 4 and 5 to v5.4, if it's ok for Tony. > > It's OK for me, didn't realize that this is a serious problem, so I missed it. > Also if possible you should queue patch 2, that reordering will cause > two H2C skbs not be released because HCI hasn't started, everytime > enter/leave IDLE state (rtw_power_[on|off]). > > Should I resend and add a v5.4 prefix or something? No need to resend, I'll try to apply patches 2, 4 and 5 as is and will let you know if there are any problems. -- Kalle Valo
