Search Linux Wireless

Re: [PATCH 5/8] rfkill: add WARN_ON and BUG_ON paranoia

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Sunday 03 August 2008, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote:
> On Sun, 03 Aug 2008, Ivo van Doorn wrote:
> > > BUG() never returns. Same for all the other places you pointed out.
> > 
> > Ah right, that doesn't sound too good. I don't think rfkill should
> > become a blocker like that. WARN_ON should be sufficient. :)
> 
> It would, if anyone ever tested the return from notify chain registering.
> But the core kernel doesn't do any checking when registering notifiers to
> the chains, and always either return zero or OOPS outright when it attempts
> to dereference a NULL pointer (at least on 2.6.25)...
> 
> So, I went with BUG().  Given the above, do you still want me to WARN() and
> return -EINVAL instead?  I can certainly do that, it would be more correct
> than what the core kernel is doing, anyway.

No, if  notify chain doesn't check, and convention is to use BUG() in this case,
then BUG() is fine with me.

Ivo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-wireless" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Host AP]     [ATH6KL]     [Linux Bluetooth]     [Linux Netdev]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Linux Kernel]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]
  Powered by Linux