Brian Norris <briannorris@xxxxxxxxxxxx> writes: >> Changing the patchwork state to RFC means that it's dropped and out of >> my radar. Also, if I see "RFC" in the subject I assume that's a patch >> which I should not apply by default. > > Ack. Well, there were some "RFCs" I sent recently that you *did* > apply, so I didn't really know what happens normally. True, I have sometimes applied RFC patches in case they look good enough and I do not want them to get lost (and this is a good example of RFC patches getting lost). But by default I drop RFC patches after a quick glance. >> > On Fri, Mar 31, 2017 at 01:21:36PM -0700, Brian Norris wrote: > ... >> > FWIW, I got an Acked-by from Amit when he was still at Marvell. And >> > another Reviewed-by from Dmitry. This still applies. Should I resend? >> > (I'll do that if I don't hear a response within a few days.) >> >> This patch is from 2017 so better to resend, and without RFC markings. > > Yep, will do. Thanks. -- https://wireless.wiki.kernel.org/en/developers/documentation/submittingpatches
