On Fri, Aug 2, 2019 at 6:55 PM Kalle Valo <kvalo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > Brian Norris <briannorris@xxxxxxxxxxxx> writes: > > > + Doug, Matthias, who are seeing problems (or, failure to try to > > recover, as predicted below) > > + Amit's new email > > + new maintainers > > > > Perhaps it's my fault for marking this RFC. But I changed the status > > back to "New" in Patchwork, in case that helps: > > But I still see it marked as RFC. So the patch in question is: > > https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/9657277/ Oops, I didn't hit the "Update" button :( I changed it now, but I'll change it back again. > Changing the patchwork state to RFC means that it's dropped and out of > my radar. Also, if I see "RFC" in the subject I assume that's a patch > which I should not apply by default. Ack. Well, there were some "RFCs" I sent recently that you *did* apply, so I didn't really know what happens normally. > > On Fri, Mar 31, 2017 at 01:21:36PM -0700, Brian Norris wrote: ... > > FWIW, I got an Acked-by from Amit when he was still at Marvell. And > > another Reviewed-by from Dmitry. This still applies. Should I resend? > > (I'll do that if I don't hear a response within a few days.) > > This patch is from 2017 so better to resend, and without RFC markings. Yep, will do. Brian
