<yhchuang@xxxxxxxxxxx> writes: > From: Yan-Hsuan Chuang <yhchuang@xxxxxxxxxxx> > > The new rssi_level should be stored in si, otherwise the rssi_level will > never be updated and get a wrong RA mask, which is calculated by the > rssi level > > Signed-off-by: Yan-Hsuan Chuang <yhchuang@xxxxxxxxxxx> Stanislaw suggested that this should go to 5.2. So what breaks from user's point of view if this is not applied? -- Kalle Valo
