On Tue, 2008-07-29 at 14:03 +0200, Luis Carlos Cobo wrote: > On Tue, 2008-07-29 at 13:51 +0200, Johannes Berg wrote: > > That sounds sane to me, then you don't need the cb at all, do you? Can > > just send it to the master dev with skb->do_not_encrypt set, right? > > Right. Ok. How is that supposed to work with crypto? Do each two peers negotiate a key and forwarding just doesn't change anything so crypto is effectively end-to-end? > > In fact, looking at the code, there seems to be a bug with promisc, are > > you sure it's allowed to netif_rx/dev_queue_xmit the same frame? > > I see, not doing a copy on that case. Yeah, that needs to be fixed, I'll > take care of it. Thanks. johannes
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
