(fixing quotation, PLEASE don't top post) Tom Psyborg <pozega.tomislav@xxxxxxxxx> writes: >> On 6 September 2018 at 17:32, Kalle Valo <kvalo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> >> Tomislav Požega <pozega.tomislav@xxxxxxxxx> writes: >> >> > Add firmware v1.4.1 that supports up to 8 virtual APs and up >> > to 16 (current limit, at least on AR9271) client interfaces. >> > (1 AP + 15 STA, 4 AP + 12 STA etc) >> > >> > Signed-off-by: Tomislav Požega <pozega.tomislav@xxxxxxxxx> >> > --- >> > ath9k_htc/htc_7010-1.4.1.fw | Bin 0 -> 72812 bytes >> > ath9k_htc/htc_9271-1.4.1.fw | Bin 0 -> 51008 bytes >> > 2 files changed, 0 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-) >> > create mode 100644 ath9k_htc/htc_7010-1.4.1.fw >> > create mode 100644 ath9k_htc/htc_9271-1.4.1.fw >> >> Is this is an official release from the open-ath9k-htc-firmware >> project >> or just some custom build of yours? I'm asking because I don't see >> anything in the master branch since January: >> >> https://github.com/qca/open-ath9k-htc-firmware/commits/master >> >> IMHO Adrian Chadd (CCed) should be the one pushing the ath9k_htc >> firmware image to linux-firmware, unless the maintainer has >> changed of >> course. > > I was not sure if the fw images from open-ath9k-htc-firmware project > are still being pulled into linux-firmware tree, so I created this > build myself to meet the requirements for one of the patches I sent to > linux-wireless list. As ath9k_htc firmere is open it's easy to create backdoors etc and this is why I think that linux-firmware should not take ath9k_htc firmware binaries just from anyone, only from maintainers of open-ath9k-htc-firmware project. > Adrian, can you push the new fw version via official channel? Adrian, can you help here? -- Kalle Valo
