Search Linux Wireless

RE: [PATCH] ath10k: Add wrapper function to ath10k debug

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 




> -----Original Message-----
> From: ath10k <ath10k-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> On Behalf Of Kalle Valo
> Sent: Friday, October 12, 2018 8:58 PM
> To: Venkateswara Naralasetty <vnaralas@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: Kan Yan <kyan@xxxxxxxxxxxx>; linux-wireless@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx;
> ath10k@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: [EXTERNAL] Re: [PATCH] ath10k: Add wrapper function to ath10k
> debug
> 
> Venkateswara Naralasetty <vnaralas@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:
> 
> > ath10k_dbg() is called in ath10k_process_rx() with huge set of
> > arguments which is causing CPU overhead even when debug_mask is not
> set.
> > Good improvement was observed in the receive side performance when
> > call to ath10k_dbg() is avoided in the RX path.
> >
> > Since currently all debug messages are sent via tracing
> > infrastructure, we cannot entirely avoid calling ath10k_dbg.
> > Therefore, call to
> > ath10k_dbg() is made conditional based on tracing config in the driver.
> >
> > Trasmit performance remains unchanged with this patch; below are some
> > experimental results with this patch and tracing disabled.
> >
> > mesh mode:
> >
> >                       w/o this patch          with this patch
> >         Traffic       TP      CPU Usage      TP      CPU usage
> >
> >         TCP          840Mbps    76.53%      960Mbps    78.14%
> >         UDP          1030Mbps   74.58%      1132Mbps   74.31%
> >
> > Infra mode:
> >
> >                       w/o this patch          with this patch
> >         Traffic        TP      CPU Usage      TP      CPU usage
> >
> >         TCP Rx       1241Mbps   80.89%      1270Mbps   73.50%
> >         UDP Rx       1433Mbps   81.77%      1472Mbps   72.80%
> >
> > Tested platform	: IPQ8064
> > hardware used	: QCA9984
> > firmware ver	: ver 10.4-3.5.3-00057
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Kan Yan <kyan@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > Signed-off-by: Venkateswara Naralasetty <vnaralas@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> 
> The first Signed-off-by should be the author's, in this case Venkateswara. If
> Kan helped to develop the patch you should also add
> Co-developed-by:
> 
> https://www.kernel.org/doc/html/latest/process/submitting-
> patches.html#when-to-use-acked-by-cc-and-co-developed-by
> 
> > +/* Avoid calling __ath10k_dbg() if debug_mask is not set and tracing
> > + * disabled.
> > + */
> > +#define ath10k_dbg(ar, dbg_mask, fmt, ...)				\
> > +do {									\
> > +	if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_ATH10K_TRACING) ||			\
> > +	    (ath10k_debug_mask & dbg_mask))				\
> > +		__ath10k_dbg(ar, dbg_mask, fmt, ##__VA_ARGS__);
> 	\
> > +} while (0)
> >  #endif /* _DEBUG_H_ */
> 
> Johannes had an interesting idea to use trace_ath10k_log_dbg_enabled().
> Could you investigate if that would work? That way we might get the
> performance improvement even when is enabled
> CONFIG_ATH10K_TRACING (but actual trace point is disabled, of course).
> 
Sure I will check on this and send next version.

> Documentation/trace/tracepoints.rst has more info about the
> trace_*_enabled() function. It does have a special requirement but I'm not
> sure if it matters here as we don't care if we loose a message or two in the
> beginning:
> 
>     "The trace_<tracepoint>() should always be within the block of the
>      if (trace_<tracepoint>_enabled()) to prevent races between the
>      tracepoint being enabled and the check being seen."
> 
> --
> Kalle Valo
> 
> _______________________________________________
> ath10k mailing list
> ath10k@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/ath10k




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Host AP]     [ATH6KL]     [Linux Wireless Personal Area Network]     [Linux Bluetooth]     [Wireless Regulations]     [Linux Netdev]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Linux Kernel]     [IDE]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite Hiking]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux RAID]

  Powered by Linux