On 10/11/2018 10:19 PM, Dan Haab wrote:
The newest firmwares provide STA info using v7 of the struct. As v7
isn't backward compatible, a union is needed.
Even though brcmfmac does not use any of the new info it's important to
provide the proper struct buffer. Without this change new firmwares will
fallback to the very limited v3 instead of something in between such as
v4.
Signed-off-by: Dan Haab <dan.haab@xxxxxxxxx>
---
.../broadcom/brcm80211/brcmfmac/fwil_types.h | 39 ++++++++++++++++++----
1 file changed, 32 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/broadcom/brcm80211/brcmfmac/fwil_types.h b/drivers/net/wireless/broadcom/brcm80211/brcmfmac/fwil_types.h
index d5bb81e..189d576 100644
--- a/drivers/net/wireless/broadcom/brcm80211/brcmfmac/fwil_types.h
+++ b/drivers/net/wireless/broadcom/brcm80211/brcmfmac/fwil_types.h
@@ -176,6 +176,8 @@
#define BRCMF_VHT_CAP_MCS_MAP_NSS_MAX 8
+#define BRCMF_HE_CAP_MCS_MAP_NSS_MAX 8
+
/* MAX_CHUNK_LEN is the maximum length for data passing to firmware in each
* ioctl. It is relatively small because firmware has small maximum size input
* playload restriction for ioctls.
@@ -601,13 +603,36 @@ struct brcmf_sta_info_le {
__le32 rx_pkts_retried; /* # rx with retry bit set */
__le32 tx_rate_fallback; /* lowest fallback TX rate */
- /* Fields valid for ver >= 5 */
- struct {
- __le32 count; /* # rates in this set */
- u8 rates[BRCMF_MAXRATES_IN_SET]; /* rates in 500kbps units w/hi bit set if basic */
- u8 mcs[BRCMF_MCSSET_LEN]; /* supported mcs index bit map */
- __le16 vht_mcs[BRCMF_VHT_CAP_MCS_MAP_NSS_MAX]; /* supported mcs index bit map per nss */
- } rateset_adv;
+ union {
+ struct {
+ struct {
+ __le32 count; /* # rates in this set */
+ u8 rates[BRCMF_MAXRATES_IN_SET]; /* rates in 500kbps units w/hi bit set if basic */
+ u8 mcs[BRCMF_MCSSET_LEN]; /* supported mcs index bit map */
+ __le16 vht_mcs[BRCMF_VHT_CAP_MCS_MAP_NSS_MAX]; /* supported mcs index bit map per nss */
+ } rateset_adv;
+ } v5;
+
+ struct {
+ __le32 rx_dur_total; /* total user RX duration (estimated) */
+ __le16 chanspec; /** chanspec this sta is on */
+ __le16 pad;
Here we add explicity padding field.
+ struct {
+ __le16 version; /* version */
+ __le16 len; /* length */
+ __le32 count; /* # rates in this set */
+ u8 rates[BRCMF_MAXRATES_IN_SET]; /* rates in 500kbps units w/hi bit set if basic */
+ u8 mcs[BRCMF_MCSSET_LEN]; /* supported mcs index bit map */
+ __le16 vht_mcs[BRCMF_VHT_CAP_MCS_MAP_NSS_MAX]; /* supported mcs index bit map per nss */
+ __le16 he_mcs[BRCMF_HE_CAP_MCS_MAP_NSS_MAX]; /* supported he mcs index bit map per nss */
+ } rateset_adv; /* rateset along with mcs index bitmap */
+ __le16 wpauth; /* authentication type */
+ u8 algo; /* crypto algorithm */
So I prefer to have padding explicit here as well, ie. a u8 field.
+ __le32 tx_rspec; /* Rate of last successful tx frame */
+ __le32 rx_rspec; /* Rate of last successful rx frame */
+ __le32 wnm_cap; /* wnm capabilities */
+ } v7;
+ };
};
Regards,
Arend
