On Wed, Oct 03, 2018 at 12:06:48PM +0300, Kalle Valo wrote: > Lance Roy <ldr709@xxxxxxxxx> writes: > > > lockdep_assert_held() is better suited to checking locking requirements, > > since it won't get confused when someone else holds the lock. This is > > also a step towards possibly removing spin_is_locked(). > > > > Signed-off-by: Lance Roy <ldr709@xxxxxxxxx> > > Cc: Daniel Drake <dsd@xxxxxxxxxx> > > Cc: Ulrich Kunitz <kune@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > Cc: Kalle Valo <kvalo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > Cc: "David S. Miller" <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > Cc: <linux-wireless@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > Cc: <netdev@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > --- > > drivers/net/wireless/zydas/zd1211rw/zd_mac.c | 2 +- > > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > Should I take this or is it going through some other tree? Sure you can take this if you like. If not, Paul McKenney will take it in his tree. Thanks, Lance > If it goes to via some other tree: > > Acked-by: Kalle Valo <kvalo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > -- > Kalle Valo
