Lance Roy <ldr709@xxxxxxxxx> writes: > lockdep_assert_held() is better suited to checking locking requirements, > since it won't get confused when someone else holds the lock. This is > also a step towards possibly removing spin_is_locked(). > > Signed-off-by: Lance Roy <ldr709@xxxxxxxxx> > Cc: Daniel Drake <dsd@xxxxxxxxxx> > Cc: Ulrich Kunitz <kune@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > Cc: Kalle Valo <kvalo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > Cc: "David S. Miller" <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> > Cc: <linux-wireless@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > Cc: <netdev@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > --- > drivers/net/wireless/zydas/zd1211rw/zd_mac.c | 2 +- > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) Should I take this or is it going through some other tree? If it goes to via some other tree: Acked-by: Kalle Valo <kvalo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> -- Kalle Valo
