On Wed, 2018-09-19 at 16:08 -0300, Marcelo Ricardo Leitner wrote: > > > If it fails and returns (nested and all) on the first failure it should > > be fine. I was thinking something like this (whitespace damaged on paste): > > This will avoid the situation that we were discussing in the older > thread, btw. I think it only avoids the part where we have to worry about "have I already set this" - which is David's point AFAICT. I'll reply over to your other email (as I already started writing a reply there) johannes
