Kalle Valo <kvalo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes: > Toke Høiland-Jørgensen <toke@xxxxxxx> writes: > >>> Unfortunately ath10k is not reporting last_tx_rate in tx_status(). So >>> I also applied this "ath10k: report tx rate using ieee80211_tx_status" >>> change. >> >> Yeah, that and the patch that computes the last used rate will probably >> be necessary; but they can be pretty much applied as-is, right? > > Unfortunately not. I think the plan is now to follow Johannes' proposal: > > "I'd recommend against doing this and disentangling the necessary > code in mac80211, e.g. with ieee80211_tx_status_ext() or adding > similar APIs." > > https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/10353959/ Ahh, right... *that* patch :) Was thinking on this one with the "as-is" comment: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/chromiumos/third_party/kernel/+/588189 -Toke
