mt76x0 isn't in 4.18 at all, it's being added in 4.19 isn't it? I'm
not sure you can call it a regression, but adding a new driver with a
known bug that breaks an entire use case (monitor mode) seems silly
when a small and tested fix is available. Pretty please.
Thanks,
Zero
On Tue, Sep 18, 2018 at 8:43 AM Kalle Valo <kvalo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> Stanislaw Gruszka <sgruszka@xxxxxxxxxx> writes:
>
> > On Tue, Sep 18, 2018 at 01:43:56PM +0200, Stanislaw Gruszka wrote:
> >> On Fri, Sep 07, 2018 at 11:13:12PM +0200, Lorenzo Bianconi wrote:
> >> > According to vendor sdk, vco calibration has to be executed
> >> > for each channel configuration whereas mcu calibration has to be
> >> > performed during channel scanning. This patch fixes the mt76x0
> >> > monitor mode issue since in that configuration vco calibration
> >> > was never executed
> >> >
> >> > Fixes: 10de7a8b4ab9 ("mt76x0: phy files")
> >> > Tested-by: Sid Hayn <sidhayn@xxxxxxxxx>
> >> > Signed-off-by: Lorenzo Bianconi <lorenzo.bianconi@xxxxxxxxxx>
> >>
> >> Acked-by: Stanislaw Gruszka <sgruszka@xxxxxxxxxx>
> >
> > For the record this is 4.19 material.
>
> I really want to minimise conflicts and because of so many mt76 patches
> conflicts are likely to happen, so I'm keeping the bar high for mt76
> patches going 4.19. Is this a regression from 4.18? If not, I think this
> should go to -next and cc stable. And besides, monitor mode isn't that
> critical anyway.
>
> --
> Kalle Valo
