Hi > > On Mon, Jun 25, 2018 at 02:55:51PM +0200, Lorenzo Bianconi wrote: > > Not sure why many integration commits in upstream is a problem. I think > > having patches posted on mailing list is better than doing them in my > > "private" tree without any review. > > > > > What do you think? > > > > I was thinking about posting mt76x0 driver in a subdir (there is sill > > some cleanup work need to be done there), wait for upstream mt76x2u > > integration, then post patches that remove duplication between mt76x2 > > and mt76x0 and add support for mt76x0e on the way. > > > > Ack, fine. I modified a little bit mt76x2u/usb architecture moving > some parts in common with mt76x0u > in mt76-usb module (e.g. mt76_queue management in tx_status data path, > tx_stats workqueue, > some mcu utility routines). In this way the integration will be easier I guess > > Regards, > Lorenzo > > > Thanks > > Stanislaw > I'm currrently working mt76x0u on top of Lorenzo's mt76x2u driver. Ulli
