Ganapathi Bhat <gbhat@xxxxxxxxxxx> writes: > Hi Kalle, > >> Arend van Spriel <arend.vanspriel@xxxxxxxxxxxx> writes: >> >> > On 5/23/2018 9:54 AM, Kalle Valo wrote: >> >> Ganapathi Bhat <gbhat@xxxxxxxxxxx> writes: >> >> >> >>> In V2: >> >>> >> >>> return ret; >> >>> } >> >>> +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(mwifiex_send_cmd); >> >>> >> >>> Instead of exporting 'mwifiex_send_cmd' we can prepare a wrapper for >> >>> the command 'MWIFIEX_IFACE_WORK_DEVICE_DUMP' in mwifiex >> module. Let >> >>> me know if we can send a follow up. >> >> >> >> So what's the plan? Can I apply this patch or should I drop it? >> > >> > Sorry. Had to reply that earlier. When adding the export I figured it >> > might not be desirable. If Ganapathi can fix it with a follow up patch >> > that would ok, right? >> >> A follow up patch sounds good to me. > > Sorry for confusions. I assume you will be margining the original > patch and want me to send the follow-up right? Correct. I applied Arend's patch now so you can send your follow-up patch. -- Kalle Valo
