Hi Kalle, > Arend van Spriel <arend.vanspriel@xxxxxxxxxxxx> writes: > > > On 5/23/2018 9:54 AM, Kalle Valo wrote: > >> Ganapathi Bhat <gbhat@xxxxxxxxxxx> writes: > >> > >>> In V2: > >>> > >>> return ret; > >>> } > >>> +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(mwifiex_send_cmd); > >>> > >>> Instead of exporting 'mwifiex_send_cmd' we can prepare a wrapper for > >>> the command 'MWIFIEX_IFACE_WORK_DEVICE_DUMP' in mwifiex > module. Let > >>> me know if we can send a follow up. > >> > >> So what's the plan? Can I apply this patch or should I drop it? > > > > Sorry. Had to reply that earlier. When adding the export I figured it > > might not be desirable. If Ganapathi can fix it with a follow up patch > > that would ok, right? > > A follow up patch sounds good to me. Sorry for confusions. I assume you will be margining the original patch and want me to send the follow-up right? > Regards, Ganapathi
