On 2018/5/16 19:42, Kalle Valo wrote: > YueHaibing <yuehaibing@xxxxxxxxxx> writes: > >> clk_disable_unprepare() already checks that the clock pointer is valid. >> No need to test it before calling it. >> >> Signed-off-by: YueHaibing <yuehaibing@xxxxxxxxxx> > > Just a note that ath10k patches are applied to my ath.git tree, not to > net-next. So adding net-next to the subject is wrong, but no need to > resend just because of that. > OK, got it, thank you
