Search Linux Wireless

Re: [PATCH 2/2] ath10k: DFS Host Confirmation

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Peter Oh <peter.oh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:

>> Sure, every software change can cause regressions. But the thing is that
>> this isn't an optional, ath10k has to have this to be able to continue
>> using DFS channels.
>
> Kalle, you said you don't know which exact FCC requirement this is for
> in another email thread. Then how come you're sure this is not an
> optional 

To me this is a mandatory ath10k feature because if the host driver does
not have this DFS channels won't work anymore.

> and this approach is right one?

That's something you need to ask the firmware team who designed and
implemented this.

This discussion is going circles, it would be a lot easier if you could
clearly say your point. But if your point is just "I don't like this"
then there's not much, if any, I can do about that.

-- 
Kalle Valo



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Host AP]     [ATH6KL]     [Linux Wireless Personal Area Network]     [Linux Bluetooth]     [Wireless Regulations]     [Linux Netdev]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Linux Kernel]     [IDE]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite Hiking]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux RAID]

  Powered by Linux