Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@xxxxxxxxxx> writes:
> Smatch complains that we should use the passed in "gfp" instead of hard
> coding GFP_KERNEL. I looked at some of the callers and this would
> probably be a bug for rtw_cfg80211_indicate_sta_disassoc() which uses
> GFP_ATOMIC and a NULL "sinfo".
>
> Fixes: 52539ca89f36 ("cfg80211: Expose TXQ stats and parameters to userspace")
> Signed-off-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@xxxxxxxxxx>
Ah, right, didn't notice that that was supposed to be a gfp value.
Thanks for the fix :)
Acked-by: Toke Høiland-Jørgensen <toke@xxxxxxx>
-Toke
