On Mon, 2008-07-07 at 19:02 +0200, Michael Buesch wrote:
> On Monday 07 July 2008 18:23:44 Harvey Harrison wrote:
> > On Mon, 2008-07-07 at 15:48 +0300, Tomas Winkler wrote:
> > > From: Emmanuel Grumbach <emmanuel.grumbach@xxxxxxxxx>
> > >
> > > This patch fixes the check at the entrance to ieee80211_rx_reorder_ampdu.
> > > This check has been broken by 511fe3f3c4ba0b5b77421336f64a19b6cd00e65f
> > > 'mac80211: rx.c use new helpers'
> > >
> > Actually, do we want something like this instead:
> >
Or, after having a coffee and actually engaging brain (similar to
ieee80211_is_data_qos)
int ieee80211_is_data_nullfunc(__le16 fc)
{
return (fc & cpu_to_le16(IEEE80211_FCTL_FTYPE | IEEE80211_STYPE_NULLFUNC)) ==
cpu_to_le16(IEEE80211_FTYPE_DATA | IEEE80211_STYPE_NULLFUNC);
}
Tomas, you want a patch?
Harvey
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-wireless" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
