Search Linux Wireless

Re: [PATCH stable] b43: Do not return TX_BUSY from op_tx

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thursday 03 July 2008 08:35:23 Kalle Valo wrote:
> Michael Buesch <mb@xxxxxxxxx> writes:
> 
> > +drop_packet:
> > +	/* We can not transmit this packet. Drop it. */
> > +	dev_kfree_skb_any(skb);
> >  	return NETDEV_TX_OK;
> 
> So no need to call ieee80211_tx_status() in this case? I'm just
> curious about this, nothing else.

I don't think we must call tx_status for dropped or lost packets.

-- 
Greetings Michael.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-wireless" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Host AP]     [ATH6KL]     [Linux Bluetooth]     [Linux Netdev]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Linux Kernel]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]
  Powered by Linux