Johannes Berg <johannes@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes: > On Fri, 2018-03-23 at 20:20 +0530, Amitkumar Karwar wrote: > >> > But maybe that's not really true at all? At least in one case it seems >> > you just kick off something called "bgscan". >> >> Yes. We have different scan implementations for device is connected >> and non-connected cases. In connected case, firmware will take care of >> timings when driver configures bgscan parameters due to power save and >> coex restrictions. In non-connected state, driver is taking care of >> it. >> I found hardware scan in mac80211 more suitable for our device. > > Yeah it's a bit odd though that you're still implementing software scan > :-) > > Perhaps we could make a special return code from the hwscan callback > that would tell mac80211 to fall back to software scanning, so you'd > only implement the connected case, and leave the rest up to mac80211? Hehe, this is exactly what I proposed during my review :) -- Kalle Valo
