On Thu, 2018-03-15 at 14:57 +0530, Amitkumar Karwar wrote: > > > What I don't like here is that you are duplicating functionality > > already > > existing in mac80211 and I hope there is a better way to solve the > > problem. Just as a a crazy idea what if the driver returns > > -EOPNOTSUPP > > when hardware scan is not possible and mac80211 falls back to > > software > > scan? But of course this depends on what Johannes thinks. > > Currently mac80211 offloads scan to driver if "ops->hw_scan" is > implemented. Otherwise falls back to software scan. > I can see below vendors have already implemented hw_scan with their > own scan state machine. This patch does the same thing. > Let me know if I missed anything here. I think the argument is that at least it looks like you're implementing the timing etc. in software in the driver again, which others don't do, they do it in firmware. Which is just software again, but we don't see it ;-) But maybe that's not really true at all? At least in one case it seems you just kick off something called "bgscan". johannes
