Hi Mathias > sorry for the delayed testing. I had to create a new test setup > first, fought with buggy hardware and was busy with other stuff. Thanks for doing it. > The two attached patches are causing a performance regression for me again: > > OpenWrt head (forced HT40, 100Mbit wired interface) > > wireless (iperf client) to wired (iperf server) > Interval Transfer Bitrate Retr > 0.00-60.00 sec 584 MBytes 81.6 Mbits/sec 666 sender > 0.00-60.00 sec 584 MBytes 81.6 Mbits/sec receiver > > wired (iperf client) to wireless (iperf server) > Interval Transfer Bitrate Retr > 0.00-60.00 sec 620 MBytes 86.7 Mbits/sec 33 sender > 0.00-60.00 sec 617 MBytes 86.2 Mbits/sec receiver > > > > OpenWrt head (forced HT40, 100Mbit wired interface) > + rt2800_change_rx_ampdu_factor.patch > + rt2800_change_ba_size.patch > > wireless (iperf client) to wired (iperf server) > Interval Transfer Bitrate Retr > 0.00-60.00 sec 356 MBytes 49.8 Mbits/sec 6 sender > 0.00-60.00 sec 356 MBytes 49.7 Mbits/sec receiver > > wired (iperf client) to wireless (iperf server) > Interval Transfer Bitrate Retr > 0.00-60.00 sec 627 MBytes 87.7 Mbits/sec 5 sender > 0.00-60.00 sec 626 MBytes 87.5 Mbits/sec receiver > > > Due to the regression I haven't tested your ampdu_density patch so > far. Let me hear if you want to see more tests done. Could you test just RX AMPDU patches, i.e. rt2800_change_rx_ampdu_factor.patch rt2800_change_rx_ampdu_density.patch I have somewhat positive results on RX performance on some devices with those. Perhaps you could confirm that :-) Regards Stanislaw
