On 2018-01-24 17:20, Johannes Berg wrote: > On Wed, 2018-01-24 at 17:11 +0100, Felix Fietkau wrote: >> >> I guess I will have to look into fragmentation. I have a second driver >> pending that only reports the CCMP PN outside of the packet, and for >> performance reasons I really don't want to translate it and move it to a >> place where mac80211 can parse it. >> I'm also looking into doing parallel rx in software to see if I can get >> more performance that way. I think for that I would also need CCMP PN >> validation in the driver. > > Fair enough. We also do it, except we just decide that fragmented > packets we don't care and can use mac80211 - but we get the PN in- > frame, just can't always use mac80211 due to parallel RX. I guess I could make the driver translate the header for fragmented packets only. - Felix
