On Wed, 2018-01-24 at 17:11 +0100, Felix Fietkau wrote: > > I guess I will have to look into fragmentation. I have a second driver > pending that only reports the CCMP PN outside of the packet, and for > performance reasons I really don't want to translate it and move it to a > place where mac80211 can parse it. > I'm also looking into doing parallel rx in software to see if I can get > more performance that way. I think for that I would also need CCMP PN > validation in the driver. Fair enough. We also do it, except we just decide that fragmented packets we don't care and can use mac80211 - but we get the PN in- frame, just can't always use mac80211 due to parallel RX. johannes
