> -----Original Message----- > From: Arend van Spriel [mailto:arend.vanspriel@xxxxxxxxxxxx] > Sent: Wednesday, January 10, 2018 4:13 PM > To: Pkshih; kvalo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx > Cc: Larry.Finger@xxxxxxxxxxxx; 莊彥宣; linux-wireless@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > Subject: Re: [PATCH 02/10] rtlwifi: fix scan channel 1 fail after IPS > > On 1/10/2018 6:19 AM, pkshih@xxxxxxxxxxx wrote: > > From: Ping-Ke Shih <pkshih@xxxxxxxxxxx> > > > > If there is no connection, driver will enter IPS state. Meanwhile, it > > fails to scan channel 1 by the command 'iw dev wlan0 scan freq 2412', > > because hardware channel setting lose after IPS. Thus, restore channel > > setting from hw->conf.channel set by last rtl_op_config(). > > > > Signed-off-by: Tim Lee <timlee@xxxxxxxxxxx> > > You need to add your sob here as well as you are submitting them. > I'll add it in v2. > > --- > > drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtlwifi/ps.c | 6 ++++++ > > 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+) > > > > diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtlwifi/ps.c b/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtlwifi/ps.c > > index 6a4008845f49..0ffe43772c9a 100644 > > --- a/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtlwifi/ps.c > > +++ b/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtlwifi/ps.c > > @@ -51,6 +51,12 @@ bool rtl_ps_enable_nic(struct ieee80211_hw *hw) > > &rtlmac->retry_long); > > RT_CLEAR_PS_LEVEL(ppsc, RT_RF_OFF_LEVL_HALT_NIC); > > > > + /*<2.1> Switch Channel & Bandwidth to last rtl_op_config setting*/ > > Is this type of comment really helpful? To me it seems the callback > names provide enough context. > Do you mean the "<2.1>" isn't needed? This is because "<1>, <2>, <3>..." exist in the function, so we want to make it to be consistent. PK
