> On Tue, Nov 14, 2017 at 02:39:31PM +0000, Peng Xu wrote: > > > I'm not even sure why this is necessary anyway though, do we really > > > think vendors will expect to be able to put vendor IEs inside the > > > subelements and override the ones outside? > > > > > > Is there even any point for the WFA ones? It seems WMM really ought > > > to be the same for all anyway, for example. > > > > I don't have any use case for such scenario. If vendor elements are > > unlikely to be present in subelement, this logic can be removed. > > As far as WMM element is concerned, I'd note that IEEE 802.11 standard does > not list EDCA Parameter Set element as one of the items that has to be same > for all the BSSs in a multiple BSSID set and as such, I'd consider it to be > allowed behavior for an AP to advertise different WMM parameters for > different nontransmitted BSSIDs. > > As far as other vendor specific elements are concerned, there could certainly > be use cases for using different values for WPA element, Hotspot 2.0 > element, MBO/OCE element. > Hi Jouni, As you pointed out the use cases for having vendor elements in MBSSID subelements, what is your suggestion to identify and process the vendor elements? Thanks, Peng
