Daniel Drake <drake@xxxxxxxxxxxx> writes: > On Mon, Nov 13, 2017 at 4:48 PM, Kalle Valo <kvalo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> Enabling MSI by default is just too invasive, ath9k is used in so many >> different enviroments that risk of regressions is high. MSI needs a lot >> of testing before we can even consider enabling it by default. > > And it seems like we already found a regression here - the MSI Message > Data is being corrupted as described in my last mail. Exactly. > Can't be fixed in firmware, but it would be good to have confirmation > of the hardware behavivour, and maybe some other solution is possible? > Are you following this up within Qualcomm? No time to do that right now, sorry. -- Kalle Valo
