On Tue, 2017-11-14 at 12:48 +0100, Greg KH wrote: > On Tue, Nov 14, 2017 at 01:38:20PM +0200, Luciano Coelho wrote: > > On Tue, 2017-11-14 at 13:29 +0200, Thomas Backlund wrote: > > > Den 14-11-2017 kl. 12:52, skrev Luca Coelho: > > > > On Tue, 2017-11-14 at 12:37 +0200, Thomas Backlund wrote: > > > > > iwlwifi 9xxx and a0 series hw contains an extra dash in > > > > > firmware > > > > > file > > > > > name > > > > > as seeen in modinfo output for kernel 4.14: > > > > > > > > > > firmware: iwlwifi-9260-th-b0-jf-b0--34.ucode > > > > > firmware: iwlwifi-9260-th-a0-jf-a0--34.ucode > > > > > firmware: iwlwifi-9000-pu-a0-jf-b0--34.ucode > > > > > firmware: iwlwifi-9000-pu-a0-jf-a0--34.ucode > > > > > firmware: iwlwifi-QuQnj-a0-hr-a0--34.ucode > > > > > firmware: iwlwifi-QuQnj-a0-jf-b0--34.ucode > > > > > firmware: iwlwifi-QuQnj-f0-hr-a0--34.ucode > > > > > firmware: iwlwifi-Qu-a0-jf-b0--34.ucode > > > > > firmware: iwlwifi-Qu-a0-hr-a0--34.ucode > > > > > > > > > > Fix that by dropping the extra adding of '"-"'. > > > > > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Thomas Backlund <tmb-odJJhXpcy38dnm+yROfE0A@pu > > > > > blic > > > > > .gmane.org> > > > > > cc: Luca Coelho <luciano.coelho-ral2JQCrhuEAvxtiuMwx3w@public > > > > > .gma > > > > > ne.org> > > > > > cc: stable-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > > > > > > > > > > --- > > > > > > > > Looks good, thanks! > > > > > > > > Though I'm not sure this is worth sending to stable... Why do > > > > you > > > > think > > > > it's needed? > > > > > > > > > > As 4.14 is a -longterm kernel and afaik atleast 9xxx series hw is > > > out > > > there I thought it would be good to have it fixed there... > > > > > > but in the end it's your call for upstream stable or not > > > > > > I'll add it to the Mageia distrib kernels anyway. > > > > Okay, fair enough. I'll add it to stable, it's a very simple and > > not > > risky fix anyway. One can claim that userspace may get confused. > > Actually I think some distros use those values to check which > > firmwares > > need to be installed, but I don't recall for sure now. > > The install scripts use those values, so yes, it would be good to > have > them be correct. Right, thanks for confirming my vague recollection. :) I've turned that into a "Cc: stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx # 4.13", since that's the first version that actually supports these HW versions. -- Cheers, Luca.
