> > > Actually, come to think of it, isn't just doing the difference as in teh > > > original patch correct in 32-bit unsigned integers? It'll wrap around a > > > bit but that's ok, no? > > > > It would make a very recent beacon to be like half an hour old on > > wraps, wouldn't it? > > No. Why would it? Can you give an example? If you are not increasing > precision, wraparounds should make no difference. That was my mistake, somehow I thought we'd have to account for wraps, but that was wrong I think. Let's use v1. johannes
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
