On 25-09-17 11:30, James Hughes wrote:
On 25 September 2017 at 10:26, James Hughes
<james.hughes@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On 25 September 2017 at 09:18, Kalle Valo <kvalo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Arend Van Spriel <arend.vanspriel@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
The firmware uses a mailbox to communicate to the host what is going
on. In the driver we validate the bit received. Various people seen
the following message:
brcmfmac: brcmf_sdio_hostmail: Unknown mailbox data content: 0x40012
Bit 4 is cause of this message, but this actually indicates the firmware
has halted. Handle this bit by giving a more meaningful error message.
Reviewed-by: Hante Meuleman <hante.meuleman@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Reviewed-by: Pieter-Paul Giesberts <pieter-paul.giesberts@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Reviewed-by: Franky Lin <franky.lin@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Arend van Spriel <arend.vanspriel@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Failed to compile:
drivers/net/wireless/broadcom/brcm80211/brcmfmac/p2p.c: In function ‘brcmf_p2p_escan’:
drivers/net/wireless/broadcom/brcm80211/brcmfmac/p2p.c:695:23: error: ‘BRCMF_SCANTYPE_ACTIVE’ undeclared (first use in this function)
sparams->scan_type = BRCMF_SCANTYPE_ACTIVE;
^
drivers/net/wireless/broadcom/brcm80211/brcmfmac/p2p.c:695:23: note: each undeclared identifier is reported only once for each function it appears in
make[6]: *** [drivers/net/wireless/broadcom/brcm80211/brcmfmac/p2p.o] Error 1
make[6]: *** Waiting for unfinished jobs....
make[5]: *** [drivers/net/wireless/broadcom/brcm80211/brcmfmac] Error 2
make[4]: *** [drivers/net/wireless/broadcom/brcm80211] Error 2
make[3]: *** [drivers/net/wireless/broadcom] Error 2
make[2]: *** [drivers/net/wireless] Error 2
make[1]: *** [drivers/net] Error 2
make: *** [drivers] Error 2
7 patches set to Changes Requested.
9948825 [1/7] brcmfmac: handle FWHALT mailbox indication
9948831 [2/7] brcmfmac: disable packet filtering in promiscuous mode
9948829 [3/7] brcmfmac: cleanup brcmf_cfg80211_escan() function
9948833 [4/7] brcmfmac: use msecs_to_jiffies() instead of calculation using HZ
9948827 [5/7] brcmfmac: get rid of brcmf_cfg80211_escan() function
9948823 [6/7] brcmfmac: get rid of struct brcmf_cfg80211_info::active_scan field
9948835 [7/7] brcmfmac: move configuration of probe request IEs
--
https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/9948825/
https://wireless.wiki.kernel.org/en/developers/documentation/submittingpatches
We (Raspberry Pi) currently have an issue open with Cypress to try and
determine the cause of the firmware lockup which results in this
mailbox error, we have some custom firmware that has better firmware
diagnostics which we have been reporting back to Cypress. Not had any
progress so far as far as I know. Does this kernel side fix help our
users in any way or is it simply a better error message?
James
Sorry, should have read the patch first, simply a change to the error
reporting. I'll try and determine how far Cypress have got with the
firmware.
Hi James,
This was indeed only about getting rid of the "unknown mailbox" message.
The times I have seen this also brcmf_sdio_checkdied() was printing a
message that a firmware trap occurred. Does the forensics file in
debugfs show anything for your issue or does the probe fail resulting in
a detach.
Regards,
Arend
