On Fri, 2017-09-08 at 16:11 +0200, Benjamin Beichler wrote: > For correct interpretation of a tx rate, the corresponding rate flags > are needed (e.g. whether a HT-MCS rate or a legacy rate) and > moreover for more correct simulation the other infos of the flags are > important (like short-GI). Keeping compability, the flags > are not integrated into the existing hwsim_tx_rate, but transmitted > as an additional netlink attribute. This still exposes a lot of internal detail - perhaps it'd be better to convert to some sort of stable rate representation, like in cfg80211? Not sure that's sufficient though, it's a bit less detailed. johannes
