Arend van Spriel <arend.vanspriel@xxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:
> On 7/27/2017 11:54 AM, Kalle Valo wrote:
>> Larry Finger <Larry.Finger@xxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:
>>
>>> From: Ping-Ke Shih <pkshih@xxxxxxxxxxx>
>>>
>>> Because it isn't always correct to use EAPOL to check 4-way,
>>> we add a timer to handle exception.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Ping-Ke Shih <pkshih@xxxxxxxxxxx>
>>> Signed-off-by: Larry Finger <Larry.Finger@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
>>> Cc: Yan-Hsuan Chuang <yhchuang@xxxxxxxxxxx>
>>> Cc: Birming Chiu <birming@xxxxxxxxxxx>
>>> Cc: Shaofu <shaofu@xxxxxxxxxxx>
>>> Cc: Steven Ting <steventing@xxxxxxxxxxx>
>>
>> [...]
>>
>>> --- a/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtlwifi/base.c
>>> +++ b/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtlwifi/base.c
>>> @@ -1408,6 +1408,11 @@ u8 rtl_is_special_data(struct ieee80211_hw *hw, struct sk_buff *skb, u8 is_tx,
>>>
>>> return true;
>>> } else if (ETH_P_PAE == ether_type) {
>>> + /* EAPOL is seens as in-4way */
>>> + rtlpriv->btcoexist.btc_info.in_4way = true;
>>> + rtlpriv->btcoexist.btc_info.in_4way_ts = jiffies;
>>> + rtlpriv->btcoexist.btc_info.in_4way_ts = jiffies;
>>> +
>>> RT_TRACE(rtlpriv, (COMP_SEND | COMP_RECV), DBG_DMESG,
>>> "802.1X %s EAPOL pkt!!\n", (is_tx) ? "Tx" : "Rx");
>>
>> The indentation looks wrong.
>
> That wrongly indented line seems a bit redundant anyway :-p
Heh, indeed :)
--
Kalle Valo
